Keeping Wildlife First in Our National Wildlife Refuge System

Celebrating America’s Wildlife Refuges on the 20th Anniversary of the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act

In 1903, President Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt established Pelican Island as our nation’s first wildlife refuge. Roosevelt was famously concerned about the potential extirpation of resident brown pelicans whose plumage fetched top dollar in the fashion industry of the day—and he was determined to do something about it.

What began as one act to preserve the inherent value of wildlife and the beauty of nature quickly burgeoned into a bit of an obsession for Roosevelt. Over the next six years of his presidency, he set aside more than 50 refuge units and his actions inspired Congress to follow suit.

But even as this nascent network of conservation lands and waters grew over the succeeding decades, it lacked a guiding mission to unify and strengthen the collection of habitat designations. The Refuge System was a “system” in name only, without a foundational statute articulating policy direction and management standards to govern the system or individual refuge units. Without an “organic act,” special interests ran roughshod over the Refuge System, pressuring managers to allow every manner of land use and development on refuges to the detriment of the wildlife and habitat they were established to protect.

Congress needed to do something.

A System under Siege

The National Wildlife Refuge System we know today emerged gradually. Legislators first passed the Refuge Recreation Act of 1962 to authorize and fund refuge compatible recreation in response to growing public demand for these opportunities. Then in 1966, Congress passed the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act to help unify management of the system.

While both acts advanced important concepts for administering wildlife refuges, neither was sufficient to stem the misuse and abuse of refuges nationwide. And it got ugly. Oil and gas drilling, mining, agriculture, livestock grazing and high-impact recreation such as jet skiing and off-road vehicle use plagued refuges across the country. By the 1990s, more than 300 refuge units – over 60 percent of the System – were being subjected to harmful activities, putting species at risk and damaging rare and sensitive habitats.

Putting Wildlife First

The Refuge System finally received the clear direction it needed on October 9, 1997. The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act, passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, amended the Refuge Administration Act and provided an overarching mission and clear management direction for the entire Refuge System:

“The mission of the System is to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans.”

The Refuge Improvement Act put wildlife first on national wildlife refuges, a precept that had never before been codified in law. It fundamentally strengthened the Refuge System, requiring the Secretary of the Interior to maintain the biological integrity, diversity and environmental health of these public lands and waters. The new statute specifically mandated that all refuge uses be compatible with the primary purpose of the individual refuge and the wildlife conservation mission of the system. It insulated refuge managers from political pressure, empowering them to ensure that all refuge activities — even wildlife-dependent priority public uses like wildlife observation, environmental education, hunting and fishing — are consistent with wildlife stewardship objectives.

Properly implemented and adequately funded, the Refuge Improvement Act works brilliantly. But even as we celebrate its twentieth anniversary, we’re fighting to preserve both the law and our system of wildlife refuges.

Here We Go Again

Driven by special interests, the Trump administration and misguided members of Congress are bent on selling out our refuges for private gain, threatening decades of progress we’ve made to protect and restore our nation’s only system of lands and waters dedicated to wildlife conservation.

Budget proposals in both the House of Representatives and the Senate would pave the way for drilling in the iconic Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The “SHARE” Act, a bill in the House, would recklessly waive environmental review for all management activities across the Refuge System. And a few fringe legislators want to give away wilderness wetlands in Izembek National Wildlife Refuge in order to plow a destructive and unnecessary road through this internationally recognized reserve. The litany of Congressional attacks goes on.

Not to be outdone, last month The Washington Post revealed that the Trump administration is making illegal plans to authorize seismic exploration in the Arctic Refuge, the first step toward oil development in one of our nation’s last great wild places. This cynical attempt follows on months of administrative attacks on the Refuge System, from the concocted “review” of our marine national monuments with the intent of downsizing and reducing protections for these vital refuge units, to foolish and wasteful bids to build a border wall that would bisect numerous borderland refuges.

Let’s Not Go There Again

Our Refuge System is unrivaled in the world, comprising more than 850 million acres of wildlife habitat that supports more than 8,000 species of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and marine life and at least 380 threatened and endangered species of plants and animals. The System provides innumerable recreational and educational opportunities, supports more than 35,000 jobs and generates billions of dollars in local sustainable economic revenue.

But those entrusted with the responsibility to steward this unparalleled network of public lands and waters have careened far off course. Between the proliferation of legislative attacks and executive misdirection, Congress and the Trump administration have put the entire Refuge System – and the future of wildlife conservation in the United States—in jeopardy.

We cannot go back to the days of unruly, unregulated exploitation and abuse of our Refuge System. The Refuge Improvement Act was enacted for a reason – to make good on Teddy Roosevelt’s legacy and manage refuges first for wildlife. We must maintain the biological integrity, diversity and environmental health of the Refuge System as mandated by its cornerstone law and continue to protect, strengthen and grow this incredible network of conservation lands.

Follow us on social media to stay up-to-date on the latest developments concerning wildlife from Capitol Hill and other news important our work. Don’t forget to sign up for our emails where you will get all the latest news and action alerts to support wildlife.

 

12 Responses to “Keeping Wildlife First in Our National Wildlife Refuge System”

  1. RM Johns

    The fraud perpetrated on the American public with the Federal wildlife refuge system is the widespread trapping and hunting that occurs on these public lands. Refuge is supposed to mean a place where wildlife species will not be relentlessly pursued by those seeking trophies and those desperate to shore up their manhood by brutally killing a defenseless animal. We haven’t had that level of protection for wildlife over multiple Federal administrations represented by the two main political parties. Sad that wildlife, unable to vote, make political contributions or advocate for themselves, are treated so dismissively and for exploitative purposes only by the elected and appointed officials responsible for perpetuating their existence. Without a healthy, functioning eco-system with abundant wildlife species, humans cannot ultimately live on Earth.

  2. Robin Soletzky

    Animal’s are God’s creatures. We need to speak up for the voiceless.

  3. Cinda Johansen

    By protecting our lands and animals we are ensuring our own future. We must all cooperate and move forward, not back to fossil fuels.

  4. Patrick Matriscino

    This is a problem with the Trump administration..between Trump, Zinke, and Pruitt : they have been trying to decimate public lands , National Parks, and endangered species….as far as I’m concerned…they should be censored, and thrown out of office before they ruin our country, our environment , and every endangered creature on the planet !!!!

  5. Kay Warren

    ALL animals, especially wolves, need to be protected & truly cared
    for. A Refuge is supposed to do this. Ours are not. Something
    is VERY WRONG. Be truly refuges. Out oil & other mining &
    contain & limit recreational activities allowed. These refuges
    should be the homes of the animals. We’ve already stolen much
    of their habitat. How would you feel if someone did this to your
    home?
    Wake up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. Sara Darby

    Our wildlife refuges in the United States should be kept intact in their natural state, to benefit wildlife and ecosystems. I am absolutely opposed to allowing industrial or commercial development in any of our wildlife refuges. If these areas are opened up to oil and gas drilling, logging, mining, and other industrial or commercial activities, they will become degraded and damaged, and the wildlife within the refuges will be in danger of becoming extinct. The United States must work harder to lessen its dependence on fossil fuels and instead create and develop more sources of sustainable, cleaner, and renewable energy.

  7. Steph

    People need to get out and vote. We cannot let this man and his cabinet have a second term. They will destroy our country and possibly our world.

  8. Kathleen Felkner

    Be stewards of our wildlife refuges, not for private gain and not for killing sprees. All life is sacred. Please continue to act in that regard.

  9. Randy Juras

    Ryan Zinke should know better. He is from Montana. But he is also an aggressive politician. And will follow Trump’s orders every time.
    Zinke knows how to kiss donors ass.
    We need to go back to protecting our environment and ecology.

  10. Pamela Goodman

    Wildlife refuges were made for a reason. They were made to protect the wildlife from man and our determination to take over everything that is in sight. The wildlife need places to live where they are not threatened. They deserve more than they are given. Man is in the wrong and must make changes to protect wildlife for all. Our future and the future of wildlife depends on us to change. Our children s children need to have places where they can go to see the wildlife that their parents and grandparents grew up with. All refuges need to be protected for all and more need to be established.

  11. Elizabeth Hecker

    Leave these refuges alone! We have enough oil and gas fields if used properly. If we let the animals become extinct from all of the pollution which comes from drilling, etc., humans will not be far behind. Are you going to let Trump and his rich cronies make all the decisions for you or are you going to stand up for the wildlife refuges? I’m standing up for the wildlife refuges so that my children and grandchildren and their children can enjoy the site of the magnificent animal wildlife!

You May also be interested in